1. Composition and Establishment of State Commissions

Each State Government in India is mandated to establish a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for its respective state.

1.1. Composition: A State Commission comprises a President and such number of members as may be prescribed, with the condition that there must be not less than two members, and one of them shall be a woman. 1.2. President's Qualification: The President of a State Commission must be a person who is or has been a Judge of a High Court. The appointment is made by the State Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court. This ensures that the head of the commission possesses significant judicial experience and expertise. 1.3. Members' Qualifications:Members are required to be individuals of ability, integrity, and standing, with adequate knowledge and experience of at least ten years in fields like economics, law, commerce, accountancy, industry, public affairs, or administration. Not more than fifty percent of the members can have a judicial background.

The composition ensures a blend of judicial acumen and practical experience relevant to consumer issues, contributing to well-rounded decision-making.

2. Pecuniary Jurisdiction: Handling Higher Value Cases

The pecuniary jurisdiction of the State Commission determines the monetary value of complaints it can directly entertain. Under the CPA 2019 (as per the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021), a State Commission has the jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as consideration exceeds ₹50 Lakhs but does not exceed ₹2 Crores.

This jurisdiction is crucial for disputes involving significant financial stakes that are beyond the purview of the District Commissions. It's important to reiterate that, as upheld by the Supreme Court in April 2025, this jurisdiction is based on the consideration paid for the goods or services, not the compensation claimed.

Examples of cases typically falling under the State Commission's original pecuniary jurisdiction:

2.1. High-Value Real Estate Disputes: A consumer has paid ₹1.5 Crores as consideration for an apartment, and the builder has committed significant delays in possession, failed to provide promised amenities, or engaged in unfair trade practices. 2.2. Major Medical Negligence Cases: A patient has paid ₹75 Lakhs for a complex surgery or prolonged treatment, and substantial medical negligence has occurred, leading to severe injury or further complications. 2.3. Large Insurance Claim Disputes: An insurance claim of ₹1.8 Crores (e.g., for major property damage, a large life insurance payout, or a comprehensive health insurance claim) has been unjustly repudiated or significantly underpaid by the insurance company. 2.4. Defective High-End Products/Machinery: A business or individual has purchased specialized machinery for ₹80 Lakhs, and it exhibits fundamental manufacturing defects or a complete failure to perform as warranted. 2.5. Significant Financial Service Frauds: Instances of large-scale banking fraud, investment scams, or other financial disputes where the consideration paid exceeds ₹50 Lakhs but is within ₹2 Crores.

3. Territorial Jurisdiction: Where a Complaint Can Be Filed

Similar to the District Commissions, the CPA 2019 provides flexible options for filing complaints before the State Commission:

3.1. Opposite Party's Location: Where the opposite party (or any of the opposite parties, if more than one) ordinarily resides or carries on business, or has a branch office, or personally works for gain. 3.2. Cause of Action: Where the cause of action (where the dispute arose) wholly or in part, arises. 3.3. Complainant's Residence/Workplace: Where the complainant resides or personally works for gain. This consumer-friendly provision allows individuals in places like Kochi or Ernakulam to file a complaint in their home State Commission, even if the service provider or manufacturer is located elsewhere in India, as long as the pecuniary limits are met.

4. Appellate Jurisdiction: Reviewing District Commission Orders

A critical function of the State Commission is its appellate jurisdiction. Any person aggrieved by an order passed by a District Commission within the State can file an appeal before the respective State Commission.

4.1. Time Limit for Appeal: An appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of the District Commission's order. However, the State Commission has the power to entertain an appeal after the expiry of this period if the appellant can show "sufficient cause" for the delay. 4.2. Pre-deposit Requirement: If the District Commission's order has directed the appellant to pay any amount, the appeal before the State Commission will not be entertained unless the appellant deposits 50% of the amount ordered or ₹25,000, whichever is less. (Note: While the Act initially set a specific cap, later rules and interpretations have clarified that the 50% pre-deposit is generally applicable without a cap for appeals from original orders, ensuring genuineness of the appeal.) This pre-deposit acts as a check against frivolous appeals.

The State Commission, while hearing an appeal, can review the facts and legal aspects of the case, either confirming, modifying, or reversing the order of the District Commission.

5. Revisional Powers: Ensuring Legality and Regularity

Beyond original and appellate jurisdiction, State Commissions also possess revisional powers. This allows them to examine the records of any consumer dispute that is pending before or has been decided by a District Commission within its State. The purpose of this power is to ensure that the District Commissions act within their legal boundaries and do not commit any material irregularity or illegality.

A State Commission can exercise its revisional powers if it appears that the District Commission has: 5.1. Exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law. 5.2. Failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested. 5.3. Acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity.

This power acts as a supervisory mechanism, ensuring quality and adherence to legal principles in the judgments of the lower tier.

6. Powers of the State Commission

The State Commission, like the District Commission, has extensive powers to address consumer disputes:

6.1. Civil Court Powers: It possesses the same powers as a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for specific purposes such as summoning witnesses, requiring production of documents, receiving evidence on affidavits, and issuing commissions for examination. 6.2. Issuing Orders: Upon finding a deficiency in service, defective goods, or unfair trade practices, the State Commission can issue a range of orders, including: Removing defects from goods or deficiencies in services. Replacing goods with new, defect-free ones. Refunding the price paid to the consumer. Paying compensation for any loss or injury suffered (including for mental agony and harassment). Directing the opposite party to discontinue or not to repeat unfair trade practices. Ordering the withdrawal of hazardous goods from the market. Directing corrective advertisements. Imposing punitive damages in appropriate cases, especially relating to product liability. * Awarding litigation costs to the complainant. 6.3. Review of Own Orders: The State Commission also has the power to review any of its own orders if there is an error apparent on the face of the record. This helps in rectifying inadvertent mistakes without the need for an appeal to the National Commission.

7. The Role in Consumer Justice for Kerala

For consumers and businesses in Kochi, Ernakulam, and broader Kerala, the State Consumer Commission plays a vital role. It is the forum for significant financial disputes, complex real estate issues, major insurance claim repudiations, and serious cases of medical negligence that cross the ₹50 Lakh threshold. Furthermore, it acts as the first appellate body, allowing for a review of decisions made at the District level. This ensures that even if a consumer is initially dissatisfied with a District Commission's order, there is a clear and accessible path for a higher-level review within the state.

Conclusion

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions are pivotal components of India's three-tier consumer grievance redressal system. With their substantial pecuniary jurisdiction, crucial appellate powers over District Commissions, and significant revisional powers, they ensure that higher-value and complex consumer disputes receive appropriate attention and that the orders of lower commissions are legally sound. For any consumer in Kochi or Ernakulam dealing with a grievance involving consideration between ₹50 Lakhs and ₹2 Crores, or appealing a District Commission's order, the State Commission is the designated and powerful forum for seeking consumer justice and asserting their consumer rights. Its dual role as an original forum and an appellate body makes it an indispensable pillar of consumer protection law in India.

Connect with me:

https://g.co/kgs/mPKwKkP

https://www.facebook.com/share/1B44BM51tW/

https://www.instagram.com/rprlegalnexus?igsh=bGFweWdpMjNkZ28x

linkedin.com/in/adv-raghesh-issac-p-226869b8

https://x.com/PIssac24903?t=f4pXaO91980uKNidGSa3Rg&s=09