1. Defining Unfair Trade Practices Under CPA 2019

Section 2(47) of the CPA 2019 defines "unfair trade practice" comprehensively. It means a trade practice which, for the purpose of promoting the sale, use, or supply of any goods or for the provision of any service, adopts any unfair method or unfair or deceptive practice, including any of the following practices:

This definition is crucial because it not only provides specific examples of UTPs but also leaves room for broader interpretation of "unfair method" or "deceptive practice," allowing the law to adapt to new forms of exploitation.

2. Categories of Unfair Trade Practices: A Detailed Look

The CPA 2019 lists various types of UTPs, which can be broadly categorized as follows:

2.1. False Representation of Goods or Services: This is one of the most common forms of UTP and involves making misleading statements about a product or service. This can include:

1.1. Misleading claims about quality, quantity, standard, or grade: Falsely stating that goods are of a particular quality (e.g., "100% genuine leather" when it's synthetic), quantity (e.g., less weight than indicated), or grade.

1.2. Misrepresenting new goods as old or vice versa:Selling "rebuilt," "second-hand," "renovated," or "reconditioned" goods as new. This is particularly relevant for refurbished electronics or appliances.

1.3. False claims of sponsorship, approval, or affiliation: Falsely representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, uses, or benefits that they do not possess. This could involve misusing celebrity endorsements or claiming a product is "government approved" without actual certification.

1.4. Misleading about the need or usefulness: Making false or misleading representations concerning the need for, or the usefulness of, any goods or services (e.g., claiming a product is essential for health when it offers no such benefit).

1.5. Unsupported Warranties/Guarantees: Giving any warranty or guarantee of the performance, efficacy, or length of life of goods, that is not based on an adequate or proper test. This also includes promises to replace, maintain, or repair goods that are materially misleading or for which there is no reasonable prospect of fulfillment.

1.6. Misleading about market prices: Materially misleading about the prices at which goods or services are available in the market.

1.7. Disparaging competitor's products: Giving false or misleading facts disparaging the goods, services, or trade of another person. This targets unethical competitive practices.

How to Identify: Look for exaggerated claims, lack of specific details, "too good to be true" offers, or claims that cannot be independently verified. Check for genuine certifications or testimonials.

2.2. False Offer of Bargain Price (Bait Advertising): This practice involves luring consumers with attractive low prices that are not genuinely available.

1.1. No intention to offer at that price: Publishing an advertisement offering goods or services at a "bargain price" when there is no intention to offer them at that price for a reasonable period or in a reasonable quantity. The aim is often to attract customers and then switch them to higher-priced items (bait-and-switch).

1.2. Misleading interpretation of "bargain price": Where an advertisement suggests a price is a "bargain price" by reference to an ordinary price, or a price that a reasonable person would understand to be a bargain, when it is not.

How to Identify: If a heavily advertised "bargain" product is consistently out of stock, or sales staff aggressively push more expensive alternatives when you inquire about the advertised item, it could be bait advertising.

2.3. Free Gifts, Prize Schemes, and Lotteries: This category covers schemes that are misleading or exploitative, often hiding costs or manipulating chances.

1.1. Gifts with hidden costs: Offering gifts, prizes, or other items along with goods, where the real intention is different (e.g., the "free" item's cost is actually built into the price of the purchased product).

1.2. Misleading "free" offers: Creating the impression that something is being offered "free" along with goods, when its price is wholly or partly covered by the price of the article sold.

1.3. Fraudulent prize schemes: Offering prizes to buyers by conducting contests, lotteries, or games of chance or skill, with the real intention primarily to promote sales or business rather than genuinely distribute prizes. This often involves schemes where everyone "wins" a small prize but is then pressured to make a purchase to claim a larger, often worthless, prize.

How to Identify: Be wary of offers that seem too generous for "free" items. Read terms and conditions carefully, especially for contests and lotteries. If claiming a prize requires a significant upfront payment or purchase, it's a red flag.

2.4. Non-Compliance with Prescribed Standards: This focuses on safety and quality issues that fall short of legal mandates.

1.1. Selling non-compliant goods: Selling or supplying goods for consumer use, knowing or having reason to believe that they do not comply with the standards prescribed by any competent authority (e.g., BIS, ISI marks), in relation to their performance, composition, contents, design, construction, finishing, or packing, where such standards are necessary to prevent or reduce injury to the consumer.

How to Identify: Check for mandatory safety marks or certifications. If a product seems unusually cheap or lacks proper labeling, it might not comply with standards. This can lead to defective goods complaints and product liability claims if harm occurs.

2.5. Hoarding or Destruction of Goods, or Refusal to Sell/Provide Services: This practice manipulates supply to inflate prices.

1.1. Artificial scarcity: Permitting the hoarding or destruction of goods, or refusal to sell the goods or provide any services, with an intention to raise the cost of those or other similar goods or services. This is particularly harmful during times of high demand or scarcity (e.g., hoarding essential commodities during a crisis).

How to Identify: Sudden, inexplicable shortages of products, or drastic price increases without a clear market reason, could indicate hoarding.

2.6. Manufacturing or Sale of Spurious Goods:

1.1. Counterfeit products: Manufacturing spurious goods or offering such goods for sale. Spurious goods are those that falsely represent themselves as genuine, or which are substituted for another, without proper authority. This is a significant concern, especially in pharmaceuticals, electronics, and branded consumer goods, and can directly lead to harm to the consumer.

How to Identify: Unusually low prices for branded items, poor packaging quality, slight variations in branding, or buying from unauthorized sellers are common indicators of spurious goods.

2.7. Not Issuing Bill or Cash Memo:

1.1. This is a new inclusion in the CPA 2019 to ensure transparency. Refusing to issue a bill or cash memo for goods sold or services rendered where it is mandated by law.

How to Identify: Always insist on a proper bill or invoice. Its absence can hinder your ability to prove purchase or seek redressal later.

2.8. Refusal to Accept Goods Returned or Provide Refund (Within Specific Period):

1.1. Unjustified refusal:Refusing to accept returned goods, or refusing to refund the consideration paid for the goods within the stipulated period, if the goods are returned within the period specified in the bill or cash memo, or within 30 days if no period is specified. This is contingent on the goods being returned in good condition.

How to Identify: Be aware of the return policy at the time of purchase. If a seller refuses a valid return within the stated period, it is a UTP.

2.9. Disclosure of Personal Information:

1.1. Misuse of data: Disclosing to another person the personal informationgiven in confidence by a consumer unless such disclosure is made in accordance with the provisions of any law. This is a crucial addition in the digital age, protecting consumer privacy.

How to Identify: If you receive unsolicited calls or marketing messages after providing your details for a specific purpose, your data might have been misused.

3. Impact and Significance of the CPA 2019's Approach to UTPs

The detailed categorization of Unfair Trade Practices under the CPA 2019 has several significant implications:

3.1. Empowerment of Consumers: Consumers in Kochi, Ernakulam, and across Kerala now have clearer grounds to challenge a wide range of deceptive and unfair business practices. This clarity empowers them to file complaints with the appropriate consumer forum (District Consumer Commission, State Consumer Commission, or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission).

3.2. Role of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA): A major innovation of the CPA 2019 is the establishment of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA).

The CCPA has the power to:

1. Conduct investigations: Investigate violations of consumer rights and unfair trade practices suo motu (on its own initiative) or based on complaints.

2. Issue directions: Issue directions to the concerned trader or manufacturer or endorser or advertiser to discontinue misleading advertisements or unfair trade practices.

3. Impose penalties: Impose penalties for misleading advertisements (up to ₹10 lakh for first offense, up to ₹50 lakh for subsequent offenses) and for manufacturing or selling spurious goods.

4. Order product recall: Direct the recall of hazardous goods and services.

5. Initiate class actions: File complaints on behalf of groups of consumers. The CCPA's proactive role is vital in tackling systemic UTPs that affect a large number of consumers, without requiring each individual consumer to file a separate complaint.

3.3. Deterrence for Businesses: The explicit definitions and the punitive powers of the CCPA act as a strong deterrent against businesses engaging in such practices. Businesses are now under greater scrutiny to ensure their advertising, pricing, and sales methods are transparent and ethical.

3.4. Focus on E-commerce:The broad nature of the definitions, coupled with specific E-commerce Rules, ensures that online platforms are also held accountable for UTPs, addressing the challenges of digital commerce. This is crucial for the growing online consumer base in India.

4. How to Seek Redressal Against Unfair Trade Practices

If you identify an Unfair Trade Practice that has caused you loss or injury, you can:

4.1. Gather Evidence: Collect all relevant documents, including purchase bills, advertisements, product labels, communication records (emails, chat transcripts), and any evidence of the misleading claims or unfair conduct.

4.2. Send a Legal Notice: Send a detailed legal notice to the trader or service provider, outlining the grievance and demanding appropriate redressal (refund, compensation, etc.).

4.3. File a Complaint with Consumer Forum: If the legal notice doesn't yield a satisfactory response, file a formal complaint with the appropriate District Consumer Commission, State Consumer Commission, or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, depending on the pecuniary jurisdiction (value of goods/services + compensation claimed). Consumers in Kochi and Ernakulam can approach the District or State Commissions in Kerala.

4.4. Inform the CCPA: For widespread misleading advertisements or practices affecting many consumers, you can also report the matter to the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), which may take suo motu action.

Conclusion

Unfair Trade Practices undermine consumer trust and distort the marketplace. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, with its comprehensive definition and proactive enforcement mechanisms through the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), provides a powerful shield for consumers against such unethical business conduct. By understanding what constitutes a UTP, consumers in Kochi, Ernakulam, and across Kerala can become vigilant participants in the market, identify deceptive practices, and effectively leverage the legal framework to demand justice and protect their consumer rights. This robust legal deterrent fosters a fairer, more transparent, and trustworthy marketplace for all.

Connect with me:

https://g.co/kgs/mPKwKkP

https://www.facebook.com/share/1B44BM51tW/

https://www.instagram.com/rprlegalnexus?igsh=bGFweWdpMjNkZ28x

linkedin.com/in/adv-raghesh-issac-p-226869b8

https://x.com/PIssac24903?t=f4pXaO91980uKNidGSa3Rg&s=09